Safety Barriers in Drag Racing: Are We Doing Enough?
In drag racing—especially at the top levels where speeds exceed 300 mph—the barrier system around the track plays a vital yet often overlooked role in safety. While concrete walls (like Jersey barriers) remain standard, modern motorsport has advanced to energy‑absorbing systems like SAFER and TecPro barriers—which raise questions about their potential utility in drag racing.
Barrier Types Used in Drag Racing
-
Concrete Walls (Jersey Barriers):
The de facto. Heavy, durable, and relatively inexpensive. Built to contain the high-speed straight-line forces inherent in drag racing.
-
Block/Masonry Barriers:
Rarely seen today; prone to shattering and creating dangerous debris. -
Armco (Steel Guardrails):
Once used on ovals or road courses, largely phased out in drag racing because of risk of snagging cars and causing unpredictable flips.
-
Catch Fencing:
Sometimes used for spectator protection, but rarely part of drag stripside safety due to high-speed car trajectories rendering them ineffective—and possibly hazardous
What Other Motorsports Use—and Why
-
SAFER Barriers:
Invented by Midwest Roadside Safety Facility and standardized in NASCAR and IndyCar ovals, these combine steel facing with polystyrene foam backing. They have eliminated driver deaths during high-speed wall impacts.
-
TecPro Barriers:
Used in F1, IndyCar, and road racing circuits—modular foam units that deform safely under impact.
Could these be adapted to drag strips? It’s technically feasible, but factors like shallow-angle impacts, car lift, and strip design create challenges. Yet many see them as a logical evolution.
There are many reasons why a track wouldn’t change. The cost is a major reason, I have seen estimations that these barriers could cost over a million dollars. Another concern is that at high speeds the new walls could act like a spring board, absorbing energy and violently pushing the car and driver back in a different direction.
Standards and Regulatory Landscape
-
NHRA and other sanctioning bodies set minimum requirements for wall height, termination points, and stopping systems at track ends.
-
Enforcement and upgrades vary widely, especially at smaller tracks that may still rely on aging infrastructure.
-
Unlike NASCAR or F1, drag racing has no universal hurdle for retrofitting SAFER or TecPro barriers.
Summary Table: Barrier Comparison
| Barrier Type | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Concrete Walls | Durable, predictable slide-off behavior | Hard surface, no energy absorption |
| Block/Masonry Walls | Cheap, some energy absorption | Brittle, debris hazard |
| Armco Guardrails | Some flexibility on angle impact | Catch risk, unsuitable for drag cars |
| SAFER Barriers | Energy absorbing, proven in high-speed crashes | Expensive, may not suit drag car design |
| TecPro Barriers | Modular, deformable, widely used in road racing | Requires redesign of runoff and wall setup |
Should Drag Racing Standards Change?
-
Yes, many industry experts—echoed by drivers like Matt Hagan—believe drag racing needs to shift from reactive to proactive safety measures TIME.
-
This could include phased upgrades to energy-absorbing systems, better runoff design, and updated barrier placement rules.
-
Cost remains a barrier, especially for smaller venues—but safety experts argue that long-term liability and reputational risk justify the investment.
Final Thoughts
Drag racing thrives on raw power and precision—but the risks are significant. As speeds climb and crashes intensify, the drag racing community must rethink its reliance on bare concrete walls. While such barriers have protected drivers in many cases, newer technologies like SAFER and TecPro systems offer clear energy-absorbing benefits that could reduce force load and improve safety.
Concrete walls got us here—but it might be time to build something better. What do you think?
